Steel production is the backbone of modern infrastructure, found in everything from towering skyscrapers to cars, appliances, and surgical instruments....
COP29 is proving to be a pivotal yet contentious chapter in global climate negotiations. With only five days left in the summit, delegates face significant challenges, from deadlocks in discussions to rising tensions over financing commitments. As the urgency to deliver tangible solutions grows, debates over climate finance, energy transition support, and the role of developing nations like China are dominating the agenda.
A Potential Stalemate
With just five days of negotiations remaining, COP29 faces mounting concerns that the entire climate process could stall, or even regress, if governments fail to compromise. Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, warned that the talks risk deadlock if countries “dig in and refuse to move on one issue until others move elsewhere.” This rigid stance has the potential to hinder progress at a crucial stage, highlighting the need for collaborative action to sustain momentum.
The first week of the summit in Baku ended with widespread frustration over the lack of progress on financing energy transitions and climate adaptation for developing countries. While the Azerbaijani presidency claimed an early success with an intergovernmental agreement on a global carbon credit system, the absence of other significant breakthroughs has disheartened some.
Clare Shakya, global climate chief at The Nature Conservancy, described the slow pace of negotiations as “unnerving,” comparing it to the stagnation seen at climate COPs prior to the 2015 Paris Agreement revitalising the process. As the summit enters its second week, pressure is mounting to accelerate discussions and deliver meaningful outcomes.
New Suggestions - The New Collective Quantitative Goal
The commitment made in 2009 by a handful of developed nations and the EU to mobilise the equivalent of £80 billion annually by 2020 (a target that was missed by two years) has become a focal point for increasing climate finance post-2025.
As the conference reaches its halfway point, these differing perspectives highlight the complexities of global climate finance discussions.
Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra is quoted as saying “A potential solution could be to… move to a space of voluntary contributions.” Suggesting that countries such as China and Saudi Arabia, whose economies have boomed since the 1990s, could voluntarily contribute to the NCQG whilst retaining their status as developing nations.
As COP29 enters its final stretch, the outcomes remain uncertain. The lack of progress on critical issues like financing for developing countries and the debate over broadening the donor base underscore the complexity of the global climate process. While early successes, such as the agreement on a global carbon credit system, offer a glimmer of hope, the broader negotiations have been less productive than expected. The coming days will determine whether this summit can break through the stalemate and set the stage for a more inclusive and effective framework to address the climate crisis.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional cookies
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.