Last month the UK Government confirmed it would abandon plans to introduce zonal pricing, opting instead to retain a single...
Read More- Energy Insights
UK Government Rejects Zonal Pricing: What Happens Now?
-
Hilly Hannam-Seymour - 2 minute read
Discover More
Ofgem has announced a reform package aimed at strengthening consumer protections within the smart meter program. From early 2026, energy...
Read More
UK Approves Berwick Bank: The World’s Largest Offshore Wind Farm
In a monumental leap forward for renewable energy, Scotland has officially approved the Berwick Bank Wind Farm, now poised to...
Read More
Last month the UK Government confirmed it would abandon plans to introduce zonal pricing, opting instead to retain a single national wholesale electricity price. The decision follows years of debate over whether regional pricing would improve efficiency or unfairly disadvantage certain areas. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband described the outcome as a step towards a system that is “fairer, more affordable, and more secure,” while Ofgem welcomed the clarity it provides to the sector.
What Zonal Pricing Would Have Meant For The UK Energy Market
Zonal pricing is based on dividing the country into regional areas where electricity costs reflect local supply and demand. Supporters argued it could ease pressure on the grid and encourage development closer to demand centres, particularly in the south of England. Opponents warned it risked penalising areas in the north and Scotland, where much of the UK’s renewable generation is located. Previous discussions across the industry have highlighted how such an approach could deepen regional divides, raising concerns over fairness and long-term investment stability.
Reactions In The Energy Industry
The decision was largely welcomed by major energy companies. SSE praised it for providing “much-needed policy clarity,” while Centrica described it as a “common-sense” move that maintains fairness and gives investors greater confidence in the UK market. Both argued that keeping a unified national price supports stability and strengthens the country’s position as a hub for renewable energy investment.
By contrast, Octopus Energy voiced disappointment, claiming that zonal pricing could have saved consumers between £3.7 billion and £5 billion annually while reducing the need for costly new grid infrastructure. These criticisms reflect the wider uproar that has surrounded the policy for years, with sharp disagreements over whether zonal pricing would deliver fairness or deepen regional inequalities.
Economic and Academic Insights
Research suggests zonal pricing might have reduced consumer costs by up to £2.3 billion per year, but these savings would likely have been offset by sharp revenue reductions—up to 40%—for northern generators. This raised concerns about the potential impact on investment in renewable projects located in those regions. While policy adjustments could have softened these effects, the uncertainty created by such a major shift risked outweighing the potential gains.
What Comes Next?
Instead of pressing ahead with zonal pricing, the government is turning its attention to other reforms. Plans include revising transmission charging, investing in grid efficiency through battery storage, and improving long-term infrastructure planning. These measures aim to tackle congestion and support decarbonisation without fragmenting the market.
Nevertheless, the debate is unlikely to disappear entirely. Regional pricing may resurface in future policy discussions, particularly with the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan due in 2026. Previous debates on how zonal energy-pricing plans sparked controversy show that location-based costs remain an important theme in the wider conversation about building a resilient, net-zero energy system.
The decision to reject zonal pricing provides short-term stability and much-needed clarity for investors. Yet the underlying issues—fairness, infrastructure costs, and efficiency—are far from resolved. As reforms in transmission and grid planning evolve, the question of whether location should influence energy pricing will continue to shape the UK’s energy landscape in the years ahead. Will the UK eventually revisit zonal pricing, or will alternative reforms be enough to deliver a fair, efficient, and future-proof energy system?